Know where you are exposed, explained in plain English.
OpenPrint turns public-source exposure checks into a short, human-reviewed report. It shows what is safe to say, withholds sensitive detail until a reviewer approves it, and makes clear what is only a lead — not proof.
Sample exposure report
Prepared for Jordan Avery (example person) · Public sources, checked over the last 30 days (example)
Jordan asked OpenPrint to check where their details appear in public sources. This is the kind of report they would get back: what was found, what it means, and what a human reviewer still needs to check.
Candidate findings are review leads, not proof.
Some details are withheld until a trained reviewer approves what can be shown safely. You see that something needs attention without the raw sensitive content.
Confirmed exposures (1)
Your username appears on two public sites
The same public username links a forum profile and a code-hosting profile. Both are public pages; nothing private was accessed.
What you can do: If you would rather these accounts not be linkable, change one username or retire the older profile.
Still being checked (3)
A marketplace profile that may be yours
A public marketplace profile shares your username and town. It has not been fully reviewed yet, so treat it as a lead, not a fact.
What you can do: No action needed yet. A reviewer will confirm or dismiss this match first.
2 more items are kept in the review queue for this sample.
Withheld pending review (2)
A sensitive document may include your details
A document on a public paste site appears to include personal details. The content stays hidden until a trained reviewer approves what can be shown safely.
Sensitive document content stays hidden until a reviewer approves a safe, minimal disclosure.
What you can do: Nothing for you to do yet. If a reviewer confirms it, the report will show only the minimum you need in order to act.
1 more item is kept in the review queue for this sample.
Dismissed after review (1)
A profile with a similar name — not you
A reviewer checked this profile and confirmed it belongs to someone else with a similar name.
What still needs human review
5 sample leads are waiting for a trained reviewer.
Check the match
A reviewer confirms whether a lead is actually about the requester.
Hold sensitive detail back
2 sample items are withheld until disclosure is safe and scoped.
Show only what helps
The final report gives the minimum useful context, not a dump of raw data.
A person reviews anything sensitive before it reaches this report. Nothing about other people is shown without consent checks and admin approval.
What OpenPrint will not do
Exposure review only works if it cannot quietly become surveillance. These boundaries are part of the product, not fine print.
OpenPrint answers specific, scoped questions about exposure. It does not continuously watch people, accounts, or feeds.
It is not for non-consensual or coercive checking of partners, family, employees, or anyone else. Requests about another person stop for consent checks and admin review.
It does not expose raw breach contents or sensitive document details. Reviewers approve a safe minimum before anything is shown.
Findings are review leads with stated uncertainty. Candidate links are not proof, and a report is not an accusation.
How human review works behind the scenes
The public report stays readable because the technical work happens in an authenticated review process. This page does not expose the reviewer console; it shows the safety contract that console must enforce.
Validate the lead
A reviewer checks whether a public-source match is relevant before it reaches the report.
Suppress raw detail
Sensitive document context stays out of the public report until there is a safe reason to show it.
Approve a safe summary
The reader gets the minimum useful explanation and a clear next step, not a technical data dump.